Modern conflict theory: challenges, explication, demarcation, classification
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Historical Development of Modern Classification Theory
Those who study classiication theory, whether it be in the form of statistical pattern recognition, syntactical pattern recognition, or neural approaches to classiication are aware of the recent achievements and advances of their elds. For example names such as Bayes, Fisher, Wald, Fu, and Rosenblatt are well known for their pioneering contributions to classiication theory. However, few are awa...
متن کاملConflict theory.
This essay covers three broad topics. First, there has been renewed debate about human nature and the roots of intergroup violence and warfare in evolutionary biology, in psychology, and in anthropology. The “ordinary man” hypothesis explains why and how humans justify and participate in violence and atrocities. Second, in addition to interstate wars, political scientists have been studying ins...
متن کاملA Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications
This article presents a theory of seven cultural value orientations that form three cultural value dimensions. This theory permits more finely tuned characterization of cultures than other theories. It is distinctive in deriving the cultural orientations from a priori theorizing. It also specifies a coherent, integrated system of relations among the orientations, postulating that they are inter...
متن کاملSoftware reliability: modern challenges
The evolution of computer technology is creating for safety-critical systems new challenges and different types of failure modes. Modern computer processors are often delivered with errors, while intelligent hardware subsystems may exhibit nondeterministic behaviour. Operating systems and programming languages are becoming increasingly complicated and their implementations less trustworthy. In ...
متن کاملExplication Defended
How can formal methods be applied to philosophical problems that involve informal concepts of ordinary language? Carnap answered this question by describing a methodology that he called “explication.” Strawson objected that explication changes the subject and does not address the original philosophical problem; this paper shows that Carnap’s response to that objection was inadequate and offers ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Ukrainian society
سال: 2013
ISSN: 1681-116X,2518-735X
DOI: 10.15407/socium2013.03.032